| Alex Foti on Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:43:10 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: <nettime> Fwd: Re: Forms of decisionism |
Brian poses the right questions. As for regulation theory mixed with
kondratiev please also see (in addition to paul mason) my two 2009
contributions which built on stuff posted on nettime
https://www.academia.edu/9343417/Climate_Anarchists_vs_Green_Capitalists (pag 5-6)
and
http://www.agenziax.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/anarchy-in-the-eu.pdf (pages after 230 for the full model) - what just want to say that
this is the crisis of neoliberalism not the crisis of capitalism. it's
a regulation, deflationary crisis like the Great Depression with
attendant fascist danngers. neoliberalism cannot regulate
informationalism properly, it cannot distribute widely and/or guarantee
consensus. the regulation regime after the Great Depression was solved
by war, but national socialism was as apt as democratic socialism in
solving the problems of fordism. i contend ideology is mighty important
in our predicament much as it was in the 1930s and 1940s in shaping the
future. Call it the Dickian moment in history. Fordism could carry
either the swastika or the whites. Everything is weird, and there's
many men in many high castels, but an alternative to european and
islamic fascism needs to be found and fast. Neoliberalism won when it
subjected political to economic power. We need to find a way for social
power to subject political and financial power. But most especially
there needs to be ideological production of a Universal Federation of
the Peoples of Earth. Crucially, the new radical ideology needs to
redistribute, but also to give sense and meaning to people's lives.
The Black Star of the Uprooted and Exploited needs to rise again from
the ashes - in what guise: TechnoPopulism might be a good name - who
knows - let's be the Surrealists who enter major ideological debate: I
side with Errejon;)
baby's cryin
lx
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Felix Stalder <felix@openflows.com>
wrote:
I begin to worry about the theory of the three crises, which Brian,
building on "regulation school" research and "long wave" economic
theories, has put forward, which has been at the core of the
techno-politics project in which I'm deeply involved, and which
informed many of the the most productive threads within nettime over
the last, say, 5 years.
<...>
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: